Benchmarks · 2026-10-15

Do the best-scoring models win?

Benchmark results from OpenRouter's unified endpoint: Artificial Analysis composite indexes, Design Arena head-to-head Elo ratings, and OpenRouter's own evals with cost and latency per task. Each is cross-referenced with the token share those models receive on OpenRouter today.

Top 20 models — Artificial Analysis · Intelligence

Higher is better (Intelligence). Bars coloured by lab.

Source
Task
Tidelines — LLM usage and market share
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of 2026-10-15. · tidelines.ai/benchmarks

Efficiency frontier — Intelligence vs output price

Bubble = usage share. The line traces the Pareto frontier: models where nothing cheaper scores as high.

Tidelines — LLM usage and market share
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of 2026-10-15. Prices: OpenRouter list output price. · tidelines.ai/benchmarks

Benchmark score vs OpenRouter share — Intelligence

Top-right = high score and heavily used · bottom-right = high score but under-adopted · top-left = popular despite a lower score. Models not in the top 50 by usage sit on the floor.

Tidelines — LLM usage and market share
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of 2026-10-15. · tidelines.ai/benchmarks

Best for web search agents

BrowseComp: accuracy, average cost and latency per task, with each model's OpenRouter token share.

Claude Opus 5 leads BrowseComp at 89.2%; GPT-5.6-Sol gets within 10% of that for $0.503 per task.

Benchmark
Tidelines — LLM usage and market share
ModelSearch engineAccuracy$ / taskLatency / taskToken share
Claude Opus 5parallel89.2%$2.362.3 min0.39%
GPT-5.6-Solperplexity82.4%$0.5031.9 min0.40%
Deepseek V4 Flash 0731perplexity77.0%$0.0762.3 min—
GPT-5.6-Lunaperplexity74.0%$0.0991.9 min1.07%
Source: OpenRouter evals (openrouter.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of 2026-10-15. · tidelines.ai/benchmarks

Web search agents

Claude Opus 5 tops OpenRouter's BrowseComp search eval at 89.2% accuracy, $2.36 per task. Source: OpenRouter evals (openrouter.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of 2026-10-15. tidelines.ai/benchmarks

What a session actually costs in Hermes Agent

Median cost of one coding session by session length. 30-day window, log scale.

Agent
Tidelines — LLM usage and market share

GPT-6 Astra Pro costs 489× more per session than Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite in this agent.

How to read: Each row is a model. Dots run from short sessions to long ones — the further right, the more a median session costs. The number on the right is the 10–49 turns median.

1 turn2–9 turns10–49 turns50+ turns
ModelMedian
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of 2026-10-11. Session-cost dataset. · tidelines.ai/benchmarks

Intelligence per dollar of real work

Benchmark score against the median 10–49 turns session cost in Hermes Agent.

Agent
Score
Tidelines — LLM usage and market share

Models on the dashed line are undominated: nothing is both cheaper and better-scoring. Bubble size is OpenRouter token share.

How to read: Cost runs left to right on a log scale, benchmark score bottom to top. Up and to the left is better value. Click a bubble for the model page.

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of 2026-10-11. Session-cost + Artificial Analysis. · tidelines.ai/benchmarks